Hooray! The November issue of ZichronNote has been put to bed, and it's still November. The electronic version has already been sent to SFBAJGS members, and the print copy will be mailed out soon. I really enjoyed the articles in this one. (Okay, I enjoy the articles in every issue!) Larry Fagan, one of our members, broke through a longstanding brick wall by availing himself of help from JewishGen classes and our brick wall session in August. Heidi Lyss, a board member, has written about the "Jews in Utah" session at this summer's IAJGS conference and the direct connection it had to her own family research. Jeremy Frankel has given us the second part of the story of discovering a lost branch of his family, and we learned that we now have part three to look forward to, with more revelations! And this time even I contributed: some updates, but still looking for a wedding photo of Jeanette August Meier Heller; and information about the JewishGen Memorial Plaques Database and how to contribute to it.
Does all of this sound like something you just have to read? Well, remember, the most recent issues of ZichronNote are available only to members of the society. If you join (at the still very affordable annual membership rate) you get a subscription to the journal, help fund research projects, and support a hobby you enjoy. And if you're interested in contributing to ZichronNote, write to me for more information.
Genealogy is like a jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have the box top, so you don't know what the picture is supposed to look like. As you start putting the puzzle together, you realize some pieces are missing, and eventually you figure out that some of the pieces you started with don't actually belong to this puzzle. I'll help you discover the right pieces for your puzzle and assemble them into a picture of your family.
Sunday, November 30, 2014
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Six Generations of Sellers Signatures
For Veterans Day I wrote about my great-great-grandfather Cornelius Godshalk Sellers and some of the events in his life, including his experiences as a New Jersey volunteer in the Civil War. I mentioned that I was waiting on a copy of Cornelius' payment voucher from 1865 and that I would then have a copy of his signature. One of the reasons this was significant to me was because it would allow me to put together six generations of Sellers signatures — Cornelius was the only one I was missing.
Guess what arrived in the mail?
Guess what arrived in the mail?
Janice Marie Sellers (me), born 1962
Bertram Lynn Sellers, Jr. (my father), born 1935
Bertram Lynn Sellers [Sr.] (my grandfather), born circa 1903
Cornelius Elmer Sellers (my great-grandfather), born 1874
Friday, November 28, 2014
National Day of Listening
In 2008 StoryCorps, a nonprofit oral history project, launched the National Day of Listening, a day when Americans are encouraged to make time to record the stories of family members, friends, and community members. It now regularly takes place on the Friday after Thanksgiving — which means today!
StoryCorps has recording booths in some cities in the United States, and conducts mobile tours, where people can come and record interviews. These must be reserved ahead of time. It also has recommendations for equipment and resources for people to conduct their own interviews.
Take some time today to interview a relative and record that person's story. Better yet, make it a family event and have multiple interviews! Save family stories and pass them down to other family members.
StoryCorps has recording booths in some cities in the United States, and conducts mobile tours, where people can come and record interviews. These must be reserved ahead of time. It also has recommendations for equipment and resources for people to conduct their own interviews.
Take some time today to interview a relative and record that person's story. Better yet, make it a family event and have multiple interviews! Save family stories and pass them down to other family members.
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
Saturday, November 22, 2014
Randy Seaver's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Make a Timeline
Today's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun event from Randy Seaver was interesting, so I thought I'd participate. He asked people to create a timeline for an ancestor and then post about it. So here's my entry.
1) Have you created a Timeline for one of your ancestors using a genealogy software program (e.g., Family Tree Maker, RootsMagic, Legacy, Reunion, etc.) or an online family Tree (e.g., Ancestry Member Tree, FamilySearch Family Tree, Geni, MyHeritage, etc.), or in a spreadsheet (e.g., Excel) or in a word processor table?
2) If not, try to create a timeline using the program/website of your choice. If so, create another one for the ancestor of your choice!
3) Show us your Timeline creation, and tell us how you did it. Which program/website did you use, the process you used, and how you captured the images to display your timeline.
4) Share your Timeline creation on your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+.
1) and 2) I have created timelines previously, but I put this one together tonight.
3) I used Family Tree Maker 16 (I've seen no need to upgrade past that version) and created a genealogy report that included all the facts I had. I then exported the information in an RTF file and did some editing in Word. I copied and pasted from Word directly into this post. (I found it amusing that a timeline with fourteen entries has thirty-eight sources!) Because I did the timeline in a word processor, I don't have any images.
Like Randy's timeline, this is pretty plain, but it has all the information and is easy to read. I also would like to add more information, starting with what O.K.S.B. stands for.
4) So I'm sharing my timeline here on my blog, I'll add a comment to Randy's post, and it will show up on Facebook and Google+. I'm covering all the bases.
1) Have you created a Timeline for one of your ancestors using a genealogy software program (e.g., Family Tree Maker, RootsMagic, Legacy, Reunion, etc.) or an online family Tree (e.g., Ancestry Member Tree, FamilySearch Family Tree, Geni, MyHeritage, etc.), or in a spreadsheet (e.g., Excel) or in a word processor table?
2) If not, try to create a timeline using the program/website of your choice. If so, create another one for the ancestor of your choice!
3) Show us your Timeline creation, and tell us how you did it. Which program/website did you use, the process you used, and how you captured the images to display your timeline.
4) Share your Timeline creation on your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+.
1) and 2) I have created timelines previously, but I put this one together tonight.
3) I used Family Tree Maker 16 (I've seen no need to upgrade past that version) and created a genealogy report that included all the facts I had. I then exported the information in an RTF file and did some editing in Word. I copied and pasted from Word directly into this post. (I found it amusing that a timeline with fourteen entries has thirty-eight sources!) Because I did the timeline in a word processor, I don't have any images.
Like Randy's timeline, this is pretty plain, but it has all the information and is easy to read. I also would like to add more information, starting with what O.K.S.B. stands for.
4) So I'm sharing my timeline here on my blog, I'll add a comment to Randy's post, and it will show up on Facebook and Google+. I'm covering all the bases.
ELLIS STEINFIRST:
Abt.
December 1851, born in Poland/Germany, to a Jewish family1,2,3,4,5,6,7,49,50,51,52
Abt.
1870, Immigration to United States34,35,36,37,38,39
July
14, 1872 married JENNIE WEINSTEIN in Titusville,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania11,12,13,14,15
Bet.
1879–1880, member of O.K.S.B.40,41
June
4, 1880, enumerated in census at 83 Spring Street, Titusville, Crawford County,
Pennsylvania, occupation huckster29,44
Abt.
1892, naturalized in Titusville, Crawford County, Pennsylvania?42,43
June
1, 1900, enumerated in census at 104 North Martin Street, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania, occupation scrap iron dealer30,45
April
21, 1910, enumerated in census at 110 Martin Street, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania, occupation junk dealer31,46
January
9, 1920, enumerated in census at 320 North Martin Street, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania, occupation scrap iron dealer32,47
April
5, 1930, enumerated in census at 320 North Martin Street, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania, occupation scrap iron co manager33,48
February
27, 1932, died in Syracuse, Onondaga County, New York, cause of death
bronchopneumonia8,9,10,28
February
29, 1932, obituary published in Titusville
Herald7
March
1, 1932, buried in B'nai Gemeluth Chesed Cemetery, Titusville, Crawford County,
Pennsylvania25,26,27
Endnotes
1. 1880 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 125 Pg 8D Ln 31. STE-C001
2. 1900 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 2A Ln 49. STE-C002a
3. 1920 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 7A Ln 31. STE-C003
4. 1930 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 20-48 Pg 4B Ln 32. STE-C004
5. New York State Department of Health,
New York State Certificate of Death, February 27, 1932, #8963. STE-V002
6. JewishGen.org, JewishGen Online
Worldwide Burial Registry, "Electronic," accessed online database
July 12, 2008. STE-V003
7. 1910 U.S. Census, Titusville City,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania ED 44 Pg 11B Ln 99. STE-C019a
8. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
February 29, 1932, page 2. STE-N013
9. New York State Department of Health,
New York State Certificate of Death, February 27, 1932, #8963. STE-V001
10. JewishGen.org, JewishGen Online
Worldwide Burial Registry, "Electronic," accessed online database
July 12, 2008. STE-V003
11. 1930 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 20-48 Pg 4B Ln 32. STE-C004
12. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
February 29, 1932, page 2. STE-N013
13. 1910 U.S. Census, Titusville City,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania ED 44 Pg 11B Ln 99, 100. STE-C019a
14. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
July 15, 1872. STE-N049
15. "Titusville Herald,"
Titusville, Pennsylvania, July 13, 1922, page 5. STE-N057
25. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
March 2, 1932, page 3. STE-N014
26. New York State Department of Health,
New York State Certificate of Death, February 27, 1932, #8963. STE-V001
27. JewishGen.org, JewishGen Online
Worldwide Burial Registry, "Electronic," accessed online database
July 12, 2008. STE-V003
28. New York State Department of Health,
New York State Certificate of Death, February 27, 1932, #8963. STE-V001
29. 1880 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 125 Pg 8D Ln 31. STE-C001
30. 1900 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 2A Ln 49. STE-C002a
31. 1910 U.S. Census, Titusville City,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania ED 44 Pg 11B Ln 99. STE-C019a
32. 1920 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 7A Ln 31. STE-C003
33. 1930 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 20-48 Pg 4B Ln 32. STE-C004
34. 1900 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 2A Ln 49. STE-C002a
35. 1920 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 7A Ln 31. STE-C003
36. 1930 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 20-48 Pg 4B Ln 32. STE-C004
37. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
February 29, 1932, page 2. STE-N013
38. New York State Department of Health,
New York State Certificate of Death, February 27, 1932, #8963. STE-V001
39. 1910 U.S. Census, Titusville City,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania ED 44 Pg 11B Ln 99. STE-C019a
40. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
June 23, 1879. STE-N002
41. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
July 5, 1880. STE-N005
42. 1920 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 7A Ln 31. STE-C003
43. 1910 U.S. Census, Titusville City,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania ED 44 Pg 11B Ln 99. STE-C019a
44. 1880 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 125 Pg 8D Ln 31. STE-C001
45. 1900 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 2A Ln 49. STE-C002a
46. 1920 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 45 Pg 7A Ln 31. STE-C003
47. 1910 U.S. Census, Titusville City,
Crawford County, Pennsylvania ED 44 Pg 11B Ln 99. STE-C019a
48. 1930 U.S. Census, Titusville, Crawford
County, Pennsylvania ED 20-48 Pg 4B Ln 32. STE-C004
49. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
December 1, 1885, page 1. STE-N007
50. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
April 16, 1887. STE-N008
51. "Titusville Morning Herald,"
February 29, 1932, page 2. STE-N013
52.
"Titusville Herald," Titusville, Pennsylvania, March 7, 1910,
page 5. STE-N051
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
"Finding Your Roots" - Alan Dershowitz, Carole King, and Tony Kushner
I have continued to watch the new season of Finding Your Roots, albeit in "encore performances" (PBS doesn't really have reruns, right?), but I find myself continually underwhelmed, both by the stories and by Henry Louis Gates, Jr., himself. It isn't that the family stories aren't interesting — if I thought family stories were boring, then becoming a professional genealogist would have been a bad career move — but the method by which Gates presents the information does not lend itself to suspense. It's hard to get excited when he says, "Please turn the page." Since he is not actually telling a narrative but merely picking out essentially random facts, the "revelations" often seem to be a connect-the-dots puzzle that has not been completed.
The overall presentation style does not help. Like an elderly aunt trying to extend her nephew's visit by doling out treats slowly over time, the guest finds himself obligated to stay longer and longer. This sense of deliberate dragging out is heightened by extensive use of bland B-roll shots as filler. How many times can we watch Gates walk slowly across a lawn or a room, gazing soulfully up at the sky or into the distance? Or see yet another nameless researcher in an unidentified repository scroll through yet one more roll of microfilm with no context?
Something I have found extremely annoying is when a celebrity asks Gates, "Where did you find this?" Most of the time Gates merely dissembles, but he has actually responded, "I can't tell you that!" Well, why not? What's the big secret? This is PBS, and it's supposed to be educational. Must our education be limited to hearing how great Dr. Gates is, and not how an ordinary person may learn about his own family? Is access to these documents limited to people with big TV budgets?
And one more pet peeve. The opening of each episode includes some CG text in the lower left corner of the screen: "A film by Kunhardt McGree Productions . . . ." I hate to deflate Dr. Gates, but these are not films; they are television episodes. Films have plots and narratives, something lacking in Finding Your Roots.
Because there is little of substance to to talk about in the program, I thought I would be able to combine commentary on more than episode in a single blog post. I surprised myself with what I had to say about only this episode, so I guess I will have a few more posts covering the program. As several episodes have been aired since my first post, I decided to pick up again with one I watched more recently, coincidentally the one with three Jewish celebrities.
As I've mentioned, we have no continuity to follow in the research process, so it's impossible for me to say anything about that. Since Gates declines to let his guests or his audience know about the big secret repository where he finds all of his stunning revelatory documents, I obviously can't comment on that either. Unfortunately, that mostly leaves me with negative observations on some of what Gates says during the program.
In "Our People, Our Traditions", Gates presented Books of Life (should I include a trademark designation with that?) to Tony Kushner, Carole King, and Alan Dershowitz. We watched the standard short background on each guest and the slow, painful parceling out of tidbits of information to each of them. I will admit, probably the most startling thing I've heard on this show, or almost anywhere else, was Kushner's recollection of the woman in Lake Charles, Louisiaia, who asked him, "Where are the horns?", because she truly believed the old anti-Semitic myth that Jews have vestigial horns on their heads. Seriously? In the 20th century? I hope that woman didn't breed. I am so thankful I no longer live in the Deep South.
At one point, when talking with King, Gates commented, ". . . like all Jewish Americans have experienced prejudice." Excuse me, but just where the hell does he get off making a blanket statement like that about several million people and passing it off as fact? Am I the only one who noticed that remark? How can he purport to know that every single solitary Jew in America has experienced prejudice? Did he conduct a survey? I sure didn't get a copy of it.
When speaking with Kushner about his family's move to Louisiana, Gates discussed the fact that many Jews who moved to the South in the third quarter of the 19th century did so not only for economic opportunity, but specifically because they were willing to do business with recently freed slaves, whereas many of the white residents of the areas would not do so. I was happy to see this point made. Even into the 20th century this situation persisted; Kushner's family started its lumber company in Lake Charles in 1927 and thrived in part because they were happy to serve the black community. (Hey, what do you know! Not every comment is negative.)
In relation to Dershowitz's ancestors, Gates explained they were from Galicia and said it was "now located in Poland." That would be a significant surprise to the many people in what was formerly Eastern Galicia, which is solidly part of Ukraine now.
This same segment with Dershowitz included an interesting piece of information I had never heard before. Dershowitz discussed an old Jewish religious law that did not permit observant Jews to travel on a ship on the Sabbhath, which is consistent with what I understand of similar restrictions, such as not being able to drive or ride in a car on the Sabbath. He didn't state when this law was modified, but if it had not been, Orthodox Jews such as my own grandfather's parents would not have been able to make the trip to the "Goldene Medina", because the ship passage took more than seven days and therefore necessitated traveling on at least one Sabbath, if not more.
Truly unfortunately, Gates did not quash an old wives' tale regarding immigration when he had the opportunity. King said she had been told that her family's name was changed at Ellis Island. This myth persists today even though many credible and knowledgeable sources have explained why it simply could not have happened. Instead of categorically denying the possibility, though, Gates said merely that it "almost never happened." Why even leave that door open? It NEVER happened.
I think Gates and his team may have bitten off a little more than they could chew with this theme. They were apparently unable to trace any of the celebrities' families back very far. I think the farthest he got was to a second- or third-great-grandfather for one person. I noted several instances of missing maiden names on the family tree sketches that were shown. This affected even relatively recent generations, such as David and Mollie Glajman, King's paternal grandparents. Very few family photographs were displayed and identified; most of the images appeared to be "generic." No really big revelations. And they didn't even talk about the DNA results, apparently because the basic results were very predictable.
And since this episode was about Jewish research, have you ever noticed the underwriters for the series? Dr. Georgette Bennett, Dr. Leonard Polonsky, Candace King Weir, the Daryl & Steven Roth Foundation — that's a lot of Jewish names, isn't it?
The overall presentation style does not help. Like an elderly aunt trying to extend her nephew's visit by doling out treats slowly over time, the guest finds himself obligated to stay longer and longer. This sense of deliberate dragging out is heightened by extensive use of bland B-roll shots as filler. How many times can we watch Gates walk slowly across a lawn or a room, gazing soulfully up at the sky or into the distance? Or see yet another nameless researcher in an unidentified repository scroll through yet one more roll of microfilm with no context?
Something I have found extremely annoying is when a celebrity asks Gates, "Where did you find this?" Most of the time Gates merely dissembles, but he has actually responded, "I can't tell you that!" Well, why not? What's the big secret? This is PBS, and it's supposed to be educational. Must our education be limited to hearing how great Dr. Gates is, and not how an ordinary person may learn about his own family? Is access to these documents limited to people with big TV budgets?
And one more pet peeve. The opening of each episode includes some CG text in the lower left corner of the screen: "A film by Kunhardt McGree Productions . . . ." I hate to deflate Dr. Gates, but these are not films; they are television episodes. Films have plots and narratives, something lacking in Finding Your Roots.
Because there is little of substance to to talk about in the program, I thought I would be able to combine commentary on more than episode in a single blog post. I surprised myself with what I had to say about only this episode, so I guess I will have a few more posts covering the program. As several episodes have been aired since my first post, I decided to pick up again with one I watched more recently, coincidentally the one with three Jewish celebrities.
As I've mentioned, we have no continuity to follow in the research process, so it's impossible for me to say anything about that. Since Gates declines to let his guests or his audience know about the big secret repository where he finds all of his stunning revelatory documents, I obviously can't comment on that either. Unfortunately, that mostly leaves me with negative observations on some of what Gates says during the program.
In "Our People, Our Traditions", Gates presented Books of Life (should I include a trademark designation with that?) to Tony Kushner, Carole King, and Alan Dershowitz. We watched the standard short background on each guest and the slow, painful parceling out of tidbits of information to each of them. I will admit, probably the most startling thing I've heard on this show, or almost anywhere else, was Kushner's recollection of the woman in Lake Charles, Louisiaia, who asked him, "Where are the horns?", because she truly believed the old anti-Semitic myth that Jews have vestigial horns on their heads. Seriously? In the 20th century? I hope that woman didn't breed. I am so thankful I no longer live in the Deep South.
At one point, when talking with King, Gates commented, ". . . like all Jewish Americans have experienced prejudice." Excuse me, but just where the hell does he get off making a blanket statement like that about several million people and passing it off as fact? Am I the only one who noticed that remark? How can he purport to know that every single solitary Jew in America has experienced prejudice? Did he conduct a survey? I sure didn't get a copy of it.
When speaking with Kushner about his family's move to Louisiana, Gates discussed the fact that many Jews who moved to the South in the third quarter of the 19th century did so not only for economic opportunity, but specifically because they were willing to do business with recently freed slaves, whereas many of the white residents of the areas would not do so. I was happy to see this point made. Even into the 20th century this situation persisted; Kushner's family started its lumber company in Lake Charles in 1927 and thrived in part because they were happy to serve the black community. (Hey, what do you know! Not every comment is negative.)
In relation to Dershowitz's ancestors, Gates explained they were from Galicia and said it was "now located in Poland." That would be a significant surprise to the many people in what was formerly Eastern Galicia, which is solidly part of Ukraine now.
This same segment with Dershowitz included an interesting piece of information I had never heard before. Dershowitz discussed an old Jewish religious law that did not permit observant Jews to travel on a ship on the Sabbhath, which is consistent with what I understand of similar restrictions, such as not being able to drive or ride in a car on the Sabbath. He didn't state when this law was modified, but if it had not been, Orthodox Jews such as my own grandfather's parents would not have been able to make the trip to the "Goldene Medina", because the ship passage took more than seven days and therefore necessitated traveling on at least one Sabbath, if not more.
Truly unfortunately, Gates did not quash an old wives' tale regarding immigration when he had the opportunity. King said she had been told that her family's name was changed at Ellis Island. This myth persists today even though many credible and knowledgeable sources have explained why it simply could not have happened. Instead of categorically denying the possibility, though, Gates said merely that it "almost never happened." Why even leave that door open? It NEVER happened.
I think Gates and his team may have bitten off a little more than they could chew with this theme. They were apparently unable to trace any of the celebrities' families back very far. I think the farthest he got was to a second- or third-great-grandfather for one person. I noted several instances of missing maiden names on the family tree sketches that were shown. This affected even relatively recent generations, such as David and Mollie Glajman, King's paternal grandparents. Very few family photographs were displayed and identified; most of the images appeared to be "generic." No really big revelations. And they didn't even talk about the DNA results, apparently because the basic results were very predictable.
And since this episode was about Jewish research, have you ever noticed the underwriters for the series? Dr. Georgette Bennett, Dr. Leonard Polonsky, Candace King Weir, the Daryl & Steven Roth Foundation — that's a lot of Jewish names, isn't it?
Friday, November 14, 2014
Fall Issue of "The Baobab Tree"
It's still autumn, right? That means the fall issue of The Baobab Tree was published on time! I'm stilll working on getting it out a little earlier, but I'm getting closer.
This issue has fewer articles than usual, but they're longer. Nicka Smith, one of my fellow board members for the African American Genealogical Society of Northern California, has written about a promise she made to a cousin to find out what happened to his brother in Louisiana, her unfinished search, and the importance of searching even when it is unsuccessful. The second article discusses a wonderful archival discovery — a letter that mentioned an ancestor and how he contributed to his community in Ohio. And I shared information about a powerful 18th-century poem written by an abolitionist, a poem that is freely available online.
So are you a member of AAGSNC? If so, you should be receiving your fall issue soon. If not, have you considered joining? Visit our Web site and become a member, and you'll get a copy also.
Have you written about your family research and discoveries? Articles for The Baobab Tree are accepted from both members and nonmembers. If you submit an article that is published, you will receive a copy of the issue with your article even if you are not a member. Submissions may be articles, reviews, graphics, or almost anything genealogy-related, both original and previously published, and must be relevant to black family history research. Submission guidelines for The Baobab Tree, including deadlines, are available online. And I'm an easy editor to work with!
This issue has fewer articles than usual, but they're longer. Nicka Smith, one of my fellow board members for the African American Genealogical Society of Northern California, has written about a promise she made to a cousin to find out what happened to his brother in Louisiana, her unfinished search, and the importance of searching even when it is unsuccessful. The second article discusses a wonderful archival discovery — a letter that mentioned an ancestor and how he contributed to his community in Ohio. And I shared information about a powerful 18th-century poem written by an abolitionist, a poem that is freely available online.
So are you a member of AAGSNC? If so, you should be receiving your fall issue soon. If not, have you considered joining? Visit our Web site and become a member, and you'll get a copy also.
Have you written about your family research and discoveries? Articles for The Baobab Tree are accepted from both members and nonmembers. If you submit an article that is published, you will receive a copy of the issue with your article even if you are not a member. Submissions may be articles, reviews, graphics, or almost anything genealogy-related, both original and previously published, and must be relevant to black family history research. Submission guidelines for The Baobab Tree, including deadlines, are available online. And I'm an easy editor to work with!
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Cornelius Godshalk Sellers, My Civil War Ancestor
Cornelius Godshalk Sellers, my great-great-grandfather, was born January 15, 1845, in Doylestown, Buck County, Pennsylvania. His family was enumerated in Pennsylvania in the 1850 census, but by the time of the 1860 census they had moved to Belvidere, Warren County, New Jersey. When the call came for volunteers to help fight for the United States in the Civil War, he wanted to enlist. Because he was underage, his father, Franklin Peter Sellers, had to sign to give his permission, which he did on August 7, 1862.
Cornelius enlisted in the 11th New Jersey Infantry, Company I. He mustered in on August 8 in Trenton, New Jersey, where he was paid a bounty of $25.
The 11th New Jersey saw action at some important battles of the war, along with several lesser-known battles:
Cornelius was admitted to the hospital again on March 24, 1864, this time in Alexandria, Virginia. The stated ailment was epilepsy.
This time, however, he apparently was not truly ill. The treatment portion of the file states, "Claims to have had frequent convulsions before admission, but has had none here — Evidently shamming." It's possible he was simply tired of fighting. He was returned to duty April 20, 1864, having missed no fights involving his unit.
Even with that little incident, he managed to be promoted to corporal on February 23, 1865, having remained a private throughout the previous two and a half years.
The Civil War officially ended on April 9, 1865, with the surrender of Robert E. Lee at Appomattox Court House. Cornelius' unit was mustered out a month later, on June 6, 1865, near Washington, D.C. He owed the government $5.45 on his clothing account, but he was due a $75 bounty, possibly for fulfilling his enlistment. The muster card indicates he was wounded at Fort Morton, Virginia, on October 6, 1864, which does not correlate with the battles I know of. Apparently he did not age during his almost three years in the army, as the card also says he was 18 years old, the same age as listed on his muster-in.
Soon after his mustering out he went to Philadelphia, where he set up shop as a printer by 1865, following the same trade as his father. He married Catherine Fox Owen, my great-great-grandmother, in January 1870. They had at least two children — Cornelius Elmer Sellers (who went by Elmer), born November 7, 1874, and Sarah Owen Sellers, born July 26, 1878.
Cornelius was still working as a printer when he died, on December 15, 1877, of acute bronchitis. He was only thirty-two years old. He was buried in Odd Fellows Cemetery three days later, on December 18.
I have just barely scratched the surface of researching Cornelius during the Civil War. I want to get copies of the morning reports for the unit, which will list his name on the roll and might have more information about the injury at Fort Morton. I have not yet had the opportunity to check for more hospital records. I have ordered but not yet received a copy of his payment voucher from June 19, 1865, for $21.46 — and then I will have a copy of his signature. I don't even know if he had a tombstone or if it survived the destruction of the cemetery. And I would dearly love to find a photograph of him, whether in uniform or civilian clothes. But research is always ongoing, and I am happy I can honor Cornelius on Veterans Day this year.
Cornelius enlisted in the 11th New Jersey Infantry, Company I. He mustered in on August 8 in Trenton, New Jersey, where he was paid a bounty of $25.
The 11th New Jersey saw action at some important battles of the war, along with several lesser-known battles:
- Battle of Fredericksburg, December 12–13, 1862
- Battle of Chancellorsville, May 3, 1863
- Salem Heights, Virginia, May 3, 1863
- Battle of Chancellorsville, May 4, 1863
- Battle of Gettysburg, July 2–3, 1863
- Beverly Ford, Virginia, August 19, 1863
- Locust Grove, Virginia, November 27, 1863
- Battle of Mine Run, Virginia, November 29, 1863
- Battle of Spotsylvania Court House, May 10–12, 1864
- Barker's Mills, Virginia, June 10, 1864
- Siege of Petersburg, Virginia, June 16–23 and July 1, 1864
Cornelius was admitted to the hospital again on March 24, 1864, this time in Alexandria, Virginia. The stated ailment was epilepsy.
This time, however, he apparently was not truly ill. The treatment portion of the file states, "Claims to have had frequent convulsions before admission, but has had none here — Evidently shamming." It's possible he was simply tired of fighting. He was returned to duty April 20, 1864, having missed no fights involving his unit.
Even with that little incident, he managed to be promoted to corporal on February 23, 1865, having remained a private throughout the previous two and a half years.
The Civil War officially ended on April 9, 1865, with the surrender of Robert E. Lee at Appomattox Court House. Cornelius' unit was mustered out a month later, on June 6, 1865, near Washington, D.C. He owed the government $5.45 on his clothing account, but he was due a $75 bounty, possibly for fulfilling his enlistment. The muster card indicates he was wounded at Fort Morton, Virginia, on October 6, 1864, which does not correlate with the battles I know of. Apparently he did not age during his almost three years in the army, as the card also says he was 18 years old, the same age as listed on his muster-in.
Soon after his mustering out he went to Philadelphia, where he set up shop as a printer by 1865, following the same trade as his father. He married Catherine Fox Owen, my great-great-grandmother, in January 1870. They had at least two children — Cornelius Elmer Sellers (who went by Elmer), born November 7, 1874, and Sarah Owen Sellers, born July 26, 1878.
Cornelius was still working as a printer when he died, on December 15, 1877, of acute bronchitis. He was only thirty-two years old. He was buried in Odd Fellows Cemetery three days later, on December 18.
I have just barely scratched the surface of researching Cornelius during the Civil War. I want to get copies of the morning reports for the unit, which will list his name on the roll and might have more information about the injury at Fort Morton. I have not yet had the opportunity to check for more hospital records. I have ordered but not yet received a copy of his payment voucher from June 19, 1865, for $21.46 — and then I will have a copy of his signature. I don't even know if he had a tombstone or if it survived the destruction of the cemetery. And I would dearly love to find a photograph of him, whether in uniform or civilian clothes. But research is always ongoing, and I am happy I can honor Cornelius on Veterans Day this year.
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Real Forensics!
Recently I had the opportunity to attend a presentation on forensic science at the Santa Clara County Crime Laboratory. I love watching true crime TV programs that discuss the forensic aspects of solving the crimes, and I am a forensic genealogist, so of course I jumped at the chance.
One of the first things the speaker did was explain what exactly forensic science is: the application of the physical and natural sciences to law (emphasis mine). I discussed the meaning of the word "forensic" a few months ago and how Mr. E. used a definition available from online dictionaries but declined to quote the entire thing. As I said then, forensic means “relating to the use of science or technology in the investigation and establishment of facts or evidence in a court of law”, with the fact that it relates to law being an important distinction. Anyone can misuse the term, but that doesn't make her . . . um, those individuals right.
So after the definition of forensic science, the audience heard about the crime lab, which is a full-service lab with a staff of 65 people. They work with about twenty different Santa Clara County police agencies but don't do anything with explosives (which are handled by ATF) or biological threats (e.g., anthrax). About 10% of their work is related to collecting evidence, about 80% is analyzing evidence at the lab, and the final 10% is taken up by writing reports on their analyses and occasionally testifying as expert witnesses in trials.
The different areas of the lab cover pretty much everything you might expect:
• trace evidence (using chemistry and microscopy)
• latent print processing (using graphite and ninhydrin)
• narcotics and controlled substances
• toxicology (blood and urine analysis, breath and blood alcohol testing)
• firearms and toolmarks
• tire tread impressions and shoe impressions
• computers and digital evidence (deleted files, cell phones, security cameras)
• document examination (handwriting, indents, alterations)
• biology and DNA
Several powerful databases are available to the criminalists working in the lab. For example, CODIS (COmbined DNA Index System) is the generic term used to describe the combination of the National DNA Index System and other criminal justice DNA systems. AFIS (Integrated Automatic Fingerprint Identification System) is the national fingerprint database maintained by the FBI. (I'm in there because I've worked with children in the past, and to do that you have to be fingerprinted so they can check to see if you have a record. I'm clean!) SoleMate is a database of more than 12,500 shoe sole patterns. Fascinating stuff!
The speaker showed slides relating to several crimes the lab has worked on, such as the Wendy's "finger in the chili" and Kenneth and Kristine Fitzhugh. I knew I had watched too many forensic shows when I was able to recognize several of the cases immediately just from one slide, before he even said anything!
I asked how many people working in the lab were certified and was told that a little under half of the staff are certified in their fields. I also asked specifically about forensic document examiners, because I know one; both forensic document examiners on staff are certified.
So what does all of this have to do with genealogy?
Well, directly, not much. Indirectly, however, there's some crossover. Certainly, it gave me another chance to kvetch about questionable (and conveniently truncated) definitions of "forensic." But I also got to thinking about how the kind of DNA testing done in crime labs is far more detailed and accurate — because it has to be — than the automosal tests that the general public pays for. If that kind of testing were available and affordable, can you image the kinds of family connections that could be made?
Oh, and the forensic document examiner I know? I met her at the Forensic Genealogy Institute, of course.
One of the first things the speaker did was explain what exactly forensic science is: the application of the physical and natural sciences to law (emphasis mine). I discussed the meaning of the word "forensic" a few months ago and how Mr. E. used a definition available from online dictionaries but declined to quote the entire thing. As I said then, forensic means “relating to the use of science or technology in the investigation and establishment of facts or evidence in a court of law”, with the fact that it relates to law being an important distinction. Anyone can misuse the term, but that doesn't make her . . . um, those individuals right.
So after the definition of forensic science, the audience heard about the crime lab, which is a full-service lab with a staff of 65 people. They work with about twenty different Santa Clara County police agencies but don't do anything with explosives (which are handled by ATF) or biological threats (e.g., anthrax). About 10% of their work is related to collecting evidence, about 80% is analyzing evidence at the lab, and the final 10% is taken up by writing reports on their analyses and occasionally testifying as expert witnesses in trials.
The different areas of the lab cover pretty much everything you might expect:
• trace evidence (using chemistry and microscopy)
• latent print processing (using graphite and ninhydrin)
• narcotics and controlled substances
• toxicology (blood and urine analysis, breath and blood alcohol testing)
• firearms and toolmarks
• tire tread impressions and shoe impressions
• computers and digital evidence (deleted files, cell phones, security cameras)
• document examination (handwriting, indents, alterations)
• biology and DNA
Several powerful databases are available to the criminalists working in the lab. For example, CODIS (COmbined DNA Index System) is the generic term used to describe the combination of the National DNA Index System and other criminal justice DNA systems. AFIS (Integrated Automatic Fingerprint Identification System) is the national fingerprint database maintained by the FBI. (I'm in there because I've worked with children in the past, and to do that you have to be fingerprinted so they can check to see if you have a record. I'm clean!) SoleMate is a database of more than 12,500 shoe sole patterns. Fascinating stuff!
The speaker showed slides relating to several crimes the lab has worked on, such as the Wendy's "finger in the chili" and Kenneth and Kristine Fitzhugh. I knew I had watched too many forensic shows when I was able to recognize several of the cases immediately just from one slide, before he even said anything!
I asked how many people working in the lab were certified and was told that a little under half of the staff are certified in their fields. I also asked specifically about forensic document examiners, because I know one; both forensic document examiners on staff are certified.
So what does all of this have to do with genealogy?
Well, directly, not much. Indirectly, however, there's some crossover. Certainly, it gave me another chance to kvetch about questionable (and conveniently truncated) definitions of "forensic." But I also got to thinking about how the kind of DNA testing done in crime labs is far more detailed and accurate — because it has to be — than the automosal tests that the general public pays for. If that kind of testing were available and affordable, can you image the kinds of family connections that could be made?
Oh, and the forensic document examiner I know? I met her at the Forensic Genealogy Institute, of course.
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Free New Jersey Maps!
Mount Holly, Burlington County |
I'm sure most people know how useful maps are when doing family history research. They can help you locate a town, determine how close together two different towns are, pick out street addresses, maybe show you where the cemeteries are, depending on the map and amount of detail. Historic maps can have information about locations that no longer exist.
So I was pretty happy to discover that the New Jersey Department of Transportation has posted online several county and state maps, absolutely free! There are detailed maps for each of the state's twenty-one counties; enlargements for large cities; maps showing railroads, the highway system, airports and heliports; congressional boundaries, legislative districts, and political subdivisions; and a statewide transportation map, both modern and the historic version from 1925.
The county maps are modern and up-to-date but still informative. Looking at the Burlington County map, I see many town names associated with my family: Mount Holly, Eastampton, Northampton, Lumberton, Rancocas, Browns Mills. Fort Dix, where my grandfather worked for some time, is about 10 miles away from where he lived in Mount Holly. The map includes many local features, such as county courthouses, colleges and universities, correctional institutions, and hospitals.
All the maps are available as free, downloadable PDF's. The sizes range from about 1 to 10 megs. Some maps can also be downloaded as KML format (for Google Earth) and Shape files (GIS vector format).
The New Jersey state tourism site has the official DoT 2012 state map, also with lots of details. This file is 23 meg.
So here's a hearty thank you to the state of New Jersey! I think I'll be wasti– . . . um, investing a lot of time looking at maps for a while.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)