It's the thing to do at the end of the year: tote up the numbers and make comparisons. But it is sometimes surprising to discover what topics people found the most interesting on my blog during the year.
I knew that this year's results would be substantially different from those of previous years because I've had somewhat of a rough year and have not written as much for my blog as I would have liked. One huge thing missing is any commentary on two entire seasons of Who Do You Think You Are? Half of the top ten for 2018 were Saturday Night Genealogy Fun posts—not actually too surprising, since Randy Seaver has good readership, and that gives everyone's posts an extra boost—and three were Wordless Wednesdays, so my family photos must attract attention for some reason.
A couple of unusual facts about this year's Top 10: The numbers were all fairly close; #1 had only 10% more views than #10. And all ten of the posts fell during the six and a half weeks from June 12 (#5) to July 28 (one of the #8 posts). I don't know if that's significant, but it's definitely intriguing.
#10 on the list is a Saturday Night Genealogy Fun post where Randy asked people to write about their second-most recent unknown ancestor (who in my case happens to be the father of my most recent unknown ancestor).
Two posts tied for #8 this year. The first is a Wordless Wednesday photo of my mother and her brother standing in front of the family home, probably in Florida, circa 1950. The second is another Saturday Night Genealogy Fun challenge, this one to determine how many generations in their family my parents and grandparents knew.
At #7 is a photo of my Canadian cousin Ben Kushner in his apartment, another Wordless Wednesday post.
#6, the third Wordless Wednesday and the highest ranking of those on the list, is a class photo of a bunch of mathematics enthusiasts (including me) at a Math Institute held at Auburn University in 1978.
I was very happy to see that my annual tribute to Loving Day made it onto the list for the first time, coming in at #5.
A Saturday Night Genealogy Fun challenge holds the #4 position on the list. That week's challenge was to determine how many individuals were in my largest family tree file.
#3 is a Saturday Night Genealogy Fun post about events that happened on the day my grandmother was born.
Ranking #2 is the most viewed Saturday Night Genealogy Fun of the year, this one Randy's "Ahnentafel Roulette."
And #1 in popularity on my blog for 2018 was when I announced that I had had two talks accepted for the 2019 Ohio Genealogical Society conference.
The most commented-on post this year was for my 7th blogiversary, in January. It was great to hear everyone's good wishes.
Genealogy is like a jigsaw puzzle, but you don't have the box top, so you don't know what the picture is supposed to look like. As you start putting the puzzle together, you realize some pieces are missing, and eventually you figure out that some of the pieces you started with don't actually belong to this puzzle. I'll help you discover the right pieces for your puzzle and assemble them into a picture of your family.
Monday, December 31, 2018
Saturday, December 29, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Make One Genealogy-related Resolution/Goal for 2019
So I was expecting something related to the new year for this week's edition of Saturday Night Genealogy Fun, and Randy Seaver did not disappoint.
Your mission, should you decide to accept it (cue the Mission: Impossible! music) is:
(1) Did you make any New Year's resolutions, or state goals and objectives, for genealogy and family history research in 2019? If so, tell us about them.
(2) If not, then make ONE resolution, or state one goal, for your genealogy research that you are determined to keep during 2019. We'll check on progress toward that resolution/goal during the year in SNGF (if I remember!).
(3) Tell us about it in your own blog post, in a comment to this blog post, or in a Facebook status post. Leave a link in Comments to any post you make.
Well, I made my last resolution so long ago I don't remember when it was, but I've stuck to it: never to make any more resolutions! So I won't call this a resolution, but I guess a goal is ok.
The goal I will set for myself is:
Return to my research on Mr. X, the biological father of my paternal grandfather, and try to determine who he is. I'm pretty sure he is a Mundy, as my father matches two different men on 107 of 111 markers on a Y-DNA test, and both of those men are named Mundy. I already have a good candidate in Bert Mundy, who was a salesman in northern New Jersey whose wife divorced him not long after my grandfather was born. When I was working on this previously, I became frustrated because both Bert's generation and his father's generation appeared to have no living descendants. I don't think I had completed my research on Bert's grandfather's generation, so that's where I will be picking up. Although I have a fair amount of circumstantial evidence pointing to Bert as the father, I would prefer to have something a little stronger if possible.
Looking back on an earlier post, this was also the goal I set for 2018. Hmm, I haven't gotten very far, have I?
I would have preferred to make my one goal finding my aunt's son whom she gave up for adoption in 1945, but I've done as much work on that as I'm capable of. Matters are now out of my control. It's just a waiting game to see if anyone appropriate matches my aunt or one of my cousins, who between them are now in all of the major DNA databases.
Your mission, should you decide to accept it (cue the Mission: Impossible! music) is:
(1) Did you make any New Year's resolutions, or state goals and objectives, for genealogy and family history research in 2019? If so, tell us about them.
(2) If not, then make ONE resolution, or state one goal, for your genealogy research that you are determined to keep during 2019. We'll check on progress toward that resolution/goal during the year in SNGF (if I remember!).
(3) Tell us about it in your own blog post, in a comment to this blog post, or in a Facebook status post. Leave a link in Comments to any post you make.
Well, I made my last resolution so long ago I don't remember when it was, but I've stuck to it: never to make any more resolutions! So I won't call this a resolution, but I guess a goal is ok.
The goal I will set for myself is:
Return to my research on Mr. X, the biological father of my paternal grandfather, and try to determine who he is. I'm pretty sure he is a Mundy, as my father matches two different men on 107 of 111 markers on a Y-DNA test, and both of those men are named Mundy. I already have a good candidate in Bert Mundy, who was a salesman in northern New Jersey whose wife divorced him not long after my grandfather was born. When I was working on this previously, I became frustrated because both Bert's generation and his father's generation appeared to have no living descendants. I don't think I had completed my research on Bert's grandfather's generation, so that's where I will be picking up. Although I have a fair amount of circumstantial evidence pointing to Bert as the father, I would prefer to have something a little stronger if possible.
Looking back on an earlier post, this was also the goal I set for 2018. Hmm, I haven't gotten very far, have I?
I would have preferred to make my one goal finding my aunt's son whom she gave up for adoption in 1945, but I've done as much work on that as I'm capable of. Matters are now out of my control. It's just a waiting game to see if anyone appropriate matches my aunt or one of my cousins, who between them are now in all of the major DNA databases.
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Wednesday, December 19, 2018
Sunday, December 16, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Make a Surname Christmas Tree
This week's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun exercise from Randy Seaver is kind of like doing holiday crafts on the computer.
Come on, everybody, join in, accept the mission, and execute it with precision.
Back in 2013, Leslie Ann had a post on her Ancestors Live Here blog titled Wordless Wednesday — Surname Christmas Tree, which I thought was a great idea for an SNGF challenge on a Surname Saturday. We last did it in 2014 — see here! Are you game?
(1) Read Leslie Ann's post and figure out how you could make something similar to hers, or to mine below, or even something different.
(2) Make your Surname Christmas Tree using your ancestral surnames — there's no limit on the number of surnames — and decorate your tree as you wish.
(3) Show us your Surname Christmas Tree and tell us how you made it in a blog post of your own or in a Facebook post. Please leave a comment here so we can all see your creation.
Here's mine:
This is how I created my tree:
• I'm not particularly creative, so I used Randy's tree as a model.
• I used InDesign to lay it out. I made a text box and added names to kind of look like a tree.
• I also colored the names green for the tree and brown for the trunk.
• I found a Christmas ornament, some presents, and a star on Pixabay (images that are legally free to reuse!) and added them to the image.
• I exported the file as a JPG and trimmed the image of extra margins in PhotoShop.
I included lots of names from the Jewish side of my family. Does that make this a combination Christmas tree/Chanukah bush?
Come on, everybody, join in, accept the mission, and execute it with precision.
Back in 2013, Leslie Ann had a post on her Ancestors Live Here blog titled Wordless Wednesday — Surname Christmas Tree, which I thought was a great idea for an SNGF challenge on a Surname Saturday. We last did it in 2014 — see here! Are you game?
(1) Read Leslie Ann's post and figure out how you could make something similar to hers, or to mine below, or even something different.
(2) Make your Surname Christmas Tree using your ancestral surnames — there's no limit on the number of surnames — and decorate your tree as you wish.
(3) Show us your Surname Christmas Tree and tell us how you made it in a blog post of your own or in a Facebook post. Please leave a comment here so we can all see your creation.
Here's mine:
This is how I created my tree:
• I'm not particularly creative, so I used Randy's tree as a model.
• I used InDesign to lay it out. I made a text box and added names to kind of look like a tree.
• I also colored the names green for the tree and brown for the trunk.
• I found a Christmas ornament, some presents, and a star on Pixabay (images that are legally free to reuse!) and added them to the image.
• I exported the file as a JPG and trimmed the image of extra margins in PhotoShop.
I included lots of names from the Jewish side of my family. Does that make this a combination Christmas tree/Chanukah bush?
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
Saturday, December 8, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: My 2018 Dear Genea-Santa Letter
Randy Seaver is getting into the Christmas spirit for Saturday Night Genealogy Fun tonight.
Come on, everybody, join in, accept the mission, and execute it with precision. Here's your chance to sit on Genea-Santa's lap (virtually) and tell him your Christmas genealogy-oriented wish list:
(1)
Write your Genea-Santa letter. Have you been a good genealogy girl or boy? What genealogy-oriented items are on your Christmas wish list? They could be family history items, technology items, or things that you want to pursue in your ancestral quest.
(2) Tell us about them in your own blog post, in a comment on this post, or in a Facebook Status post. Please leave a comment on this post if you write your own post.
Dear Genea-Santa,
I've had some problems this past year, but I still think I generally did good by genealogy. I worked at my local Family History Center all year, I was involved with three genealogical societies, I volunteered to coordinate a group when the previous person had to step down, and I gave a fair number of talks at conferences and society meetings. I'm still posting to my blog, and I did get some research done during the year.
I actually did kind of get one of my wishes from last year. When I traveled to Washington, D.C. to give a presentation to the Jewish Genealogical Society of Greater Washington, I was able to visit the U.S. Holocaust Museum library. With the help of Megan Lewis, I discovered many digitized documents relating to Jews in Grodno gubernia during World War II. Not directly related to my family research, but helpful nonetheless.
Unfortunately, I still have not made progress on the most important item on my wish list, and this year it's the only thing I"m asking for: finding out what happened to Raymond Lawrence Sellers, the son whom my aunt gave up for adoption in 1945. Aunt Dottie is now 93, and I'm really running out of time on this, Santa. I need all the help you (and anyone else) can give me. My aunt's DNA is in Family Tree DNA and GEDMatch; Raymond's half-brother is in Ancestry; and his full sister is now in 23andMe I have all the major bases covered — and still nothing. Someone out there must know something. Throw me a bone, please!
Everything else pales in comparison to getting this one wish. If there's anything else I can do to help the process, let me know.
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
Saturday, December 1, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Favorite Winter Activity Growing Up
After a couple of weeks of "classics", Randy Seaver has a new topic this week for Saturday Night Genealogy Fun.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) Winter arrives this month all over the northern hemisphere, and the daily routines of work, education, and play change along with the seasons.
(2) What were your favorite winter activities when you were a child and teenager and young adult?
(3) Share your memories on your own blog post, in a Facebook post, or in a comment on this post. Please leave a link as a comment on this post if you write your own blog post so that everyone can read all about it.
Thank you to Linda Stufflebean for suggesting this topic.
I grew up in warm-weather areas — Los Angeles County; Sydney, Australia; and Florida — so the types of things that people think of as "winter activities" weren't usually something we did. Sure, we might get some rain (and it actually can get below freezing in the Florida Panhandle, which is where I used to live), but overall not the kinds of locations that come to mind when you say "winter." Neither of my parents were into ice skating or skiing, so we didn't go anywhere to do that.
But while my family lived in Los Angeles County (we were there until 1971), we did have a tradition for at least a couple of years where my father and Uncle Tony (not really our uncle, but a close friend of my father) drove up to Mount Baldy (which I've just learned is officially named Mount San Antonio; never heard that name before!) in a pickup truck and filled the truck bed with snow. They then brought the snow back to the house, and we were able to play with it for a while before it melted. I don't remember if it lasted long enough for us to make anything resembling a snowman, though!
As a young adult I lived in California again, actually in Los Angeles, so it was still pretty temperate in the winter. I think the closest thing I had to a winter activity was spending Christmas break visiting my parents while I was still in college. At least that's all I can remember now.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) Winter arrives this month all over the northern hemisphere, and the daily routines of work, education, and play change along with the seasons.
(2) What were your favorite winter activities when you were a child and teenager and young adult?
(3) Share your memories on your own blog post, in a Facebook post, or in a comment on this post. Please leave a link as a comment on this post if you write your own blog post so that everyone can read all about it.
Thank you to Linda Stufflebean for suggesting this topic.
I grew up in warm-weather areas — Los Angeles County; Sydney, Australia; and Florida — so the types of things that people think of as "winter activities" weren't usually something we did. Sure, we might get some rain (and it actually can get below freezing in the Florida Panhandle, which is where I used to live), but overall not the kinds of locations that come to mind when you say "winter." Neither of my parents were into ice skating or skiing, so we didn't go anywhere to do that.
But while my family lived in Los Angeles County (we were there until 1971), we did have a tradition for at least a couple of years where my father and Uncle Tony (not really our uncle, but a close friend of my father) drove up to Mount Baldy (which I've just learned is officially named Mount San Antonio; never heard that name before!) in a pickup truck and filled the truck bed with snow. They then brought the snow back to the house, and we were able to play with it for a while before it melted. I don't remember if it lasted long enough for us to make anything resembling a snowman, though!
As a young adult I lived in California again, actually in Los Angeles, so it was still pretty temperate in the winter. I think the closest thing I had to a winter activity was spending Christmas break visiting my parents while I was still in college. At least that's all I can remember now.
Wednesday, November 28, 2018
Wednesday, November 21, 2018
Monday, November 19, 2018
National Day of Listening 2018
This week we will celebrate Thanksgiving in the United States, when people gather together in appreciation of their families and friends. And because all those families and friends are gathered together in one spot, it's the perfect time to sit down and share stories, one of the best things you can collect as a family historian or genealogist.
In 2008, StoryCorps, a nonprofit oral history project, launched the National Day of Listening, when Americans are encouraged to record the stories of family members, friends, and community members. StoryCorps designated the Friday after Thanksgiving as the Day of Listening as a contrast to the commercial perspective of Black Friday.
Make the time this Friday to interview a relative or friend and record that person's story. Use a mobile phone, digital camera, videocamera, cassette tape, the StoryCorps app, or whatever you have handy. Write it down if you have to! (StoryCorps does have recommendations for questions, equipment, and resources for people to conduct their own interviews, since you have time to plan ahead.) If you are with more than one family member, make it a family event and have multiple interviews. Save those family stories and share them with other family members.
After Thanksgiving, if you have time and are in one of the right locations, StoryCorps has recording booths in some cities in the United States and also conducts mobile tours, where people can come and record interviews. These must be reserved ahead of time.
StoryCorps has specific "initiatives" focused on oral histories from particular segments of the population. Visit the site to learn about the Griot (black Americans), Historias (Latino Americans), Military Voices (service members), and Teachers initiatives, in addition to others.
In 2008, StoryCorps, a nonprofit oral history project, launched the National Day of Listening, when Americans are encouraged to record the stories of family members, friends, and community members. StoryCorps designated the Friday after Thanksgiving as the Day of Listening as a contrast to the commercial perspective of Black Friday.
Make the time this Friday to interview a relative or friend and record that person's story. Use a mobile phone, digital camera, videocamera, cassette tape, the StoryCorps app, or whatever you have handy. Write it down if you have to! (StoryCorps does have recommendations for questions, equipment, and resources for people to conduct their own interviews, since you have time to plan ahead.) If you are with more than one family member, make it a family event and have multiple interviews. Save those family stories and share them with other family members.
After Thanksgiving, if you have time and are in one of the right locations, StoryCorps has recording booths in some cities in the United States and also conducts mobile tours, where people can come and record interviews. These must be reserved ahead of time.
StoryCorps has specific "initiatives" focused on oral histories from particular segments of the population. Visit the site to learn about the Griot (black Americans), Historias (Latino Americans), Military Voices (service members), and Teachers initiatives, in addition to others.
Wednesday, November 14, 2018
Sunday, November 11, 2018
Armistice Day, November 11, 1918
My friend's grandfather Zalmon Orloff served in the U.S. Army during World War I. He was in Saumur, France when the armistice was signed.
Zalmon wrote letters to his girlfriend about every other day while he was in the Army. For some reason, after he returned to the States and was mustered out of the service, Zalmon had his girlfriend type up the letters he had written and send him the typed copies. This means that a hundred years later, my friend has copies of the letters Zalmon wrote, including the one he wrote on Armistice Day.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
Dear Sarah:
I don't know how to begin my letter. The beginning though, does not matter anyhow.
The main thing is that the population of France, Saumur included, is gone stark mad with joy on account of the armistice signed this morning.
French and American soldiers, men, women, boys and girls are embracing one another and the words "GUERRE EST FINIS" were on everybody's lips.
The wine shops were doing a rushing business and the natural merriment was greatly increased by the artificial one.
Groups of Americans and French gathered around every corner and sang the Marsellaise on the top of their voice.
Every nook and corner was full of children, who, waving the tricolor or the Stars and Stripes, sang their favorite songs and exploded fireworks in your very face.
The French and American buglers were blowing every tune imaginable and I doubt whether Saumur ever witnessed a similar scene.
Have read in the papers the conditions of the armistice and about the revolutionary movement spreading in Germany.
Why, Sarah, it seems as if it were a dream and I have to pinch myself to realize that I am wide awake and the wonderful news is a real, genuine unadulterated fact.
I never expected that the end of the misery will come so soon.
Hurrah!
Zalmon wrote letters to his girlfriend about every other day while he was in the Army. For some reason, after he returned to the States and was mustered out of the service, Zalmon had his girlfriend type up the letters he had written and send him the typed copies. This means that a hundred years later, my friend has copies of the letters Zalmon wrote, including the one he wrote on Armistice Day.
-- >< -- >< -- >< -- >< --
S.A.S.
Saumur, France
Dear Sarah:
I don't know how to begin my letter. The beginning though, does not matter anyhow.
The main thing is that the population of France, Saumur included, is gone stark mad with joy on account of the armistice signed this morning.
French and American soldiers, men, women, boys and girls are embracing one another and the words "GUERRE EST FINIS" were on everybody's lips.
The wine shops were doing a rushing business and the natural merriment was greatly increased by the artificial one.
Groups of Americans and French gathered around every corner and sang the Marsellaise on the top of their voice.
Every nook and corner was full of children, who, waving the tricolor or the Stars and Stripes, sang their favorite songs and exploded fireworks in your very face.
The French and American buglers were blowing every tune imaginable and I doubt whether Saumur ever witnessed a similar scene.
Have read in the papers the conditions of the armistice and about the revolutionary movement spreading in Germany.
Why, Sarah, it seems as if it were a dream and I have to pinch myself to realize that I am wide awake and the wonderful news is a real, genuine unadulterated fact.
I never expected that the end of the misery will come so soon.
Hurrah!
Zalmon
Wednesday, November 7, 2018
Saturday, November 3, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Zigzag Ancestor Lines
There's probably an existing term for what Randy has come up with for this week's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun, but I don't know what it is.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) What is your father's zigzag ancestor line (NOTE: I just made that up}? In other words, your father's mother's father's mother's etc. line back as far as you can go.
(2) Tell us in your own blog post (and drop a link here in a comment), or on Facebook with your response.
Okey-dokey, here are mine.
My Father:
1. My father is Bertram Lynn Sellers, Jr. (1935– ) of New Jersey, California, and Florida.
2. His mother was Anna Gauntt (1893–1986) of New Jersey, Florida, and Minnesota.
3. Her father was Thomas Kirkland Gauntt (1870–1951) of Burlingotn County, New Jersey.
4. His mother was Amelia Gibson (1831–1908) of Burlington County, New Jersey.
5. Her father was supposedly John Gibson, about whom I have no additional information.
So I go back five generations on my father's line (and obviously need to do more research in Burlington County to get past that roadblock).
My Mother:
1. My mother was Myra Roslyn Meckler (1940–1985) of New York, California, and Florida.
2. Her father was Abraham Meckler (1912–1989) of New York, Nevada, and Florida.
3. His mother was Mushe Zelda Nowicki (about 1880–1936) of Grodno Gubernia, Russian Empire and New York.
4. Her father was Gershon Itzhak Nowicki (about 1858–1948) of Grodno Gubernia, Russian Empire and New York.
5. His mother was Sirke (?–before 1893), for whom I don't even have a family name, much less the name of a parent.
And I go back five generations on my mother's line also. I don't know if I'll ever find more information about Sirke, since Grodno Gubernia is the black hole of Jewish records.
I didn't do as badly as I thought I would. I have one fewer generation for my father's family line than Randy did but one more for my mother's.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) What is your father's zigzag ancestor line (NOTE: I just made that up}? In other words, your father's mother's father's mother's etc. line back as far as you can go.
(2) Tell us in your own blog post (and drop a link here in a comment), or on Facebook with your response.
Okey-dokey, here are mine.
My Father:
1. My father is Bertram Lynn Sellers, Jr. (1935– ) of New Jersey, California, and Florida.
2. His mother was Anna Gauntt (1893–1986) of New Jersey, Florida, and Minnesota.
3. Her father was Thomas Kirkland Gauntt (1870–1951) of Burlingotn County, New Jersey.
4. His mother was Amelia Gibson (1831–1908) of Burlington County, New Jersey.
5. Her father was supposedly John Gibson, about whom I have no additional information.
So I go back five generations on my father's line (and obviously need to do more research in Burlington County to get past that roadblock).
My Mother:
1. My mother was Myra Roslyn Meckler (1940–1985) of New York, California, and Florida.
2. Her father was Abraham Meckler (1912–1989) of New York, Nevada, and Florida.
3. His mother was Mushe Zelda Nowicki (about 1880–1936) of Grodno Gubernia, Russian Empire and New York.
4. Her father was Gershon Itzhak Nowicki (about 1858–1948) of Grodno Gubernia, Russian Empire and New York.
5. His mother was Sirke (?–before 1893), for whom I don't even have a family name, much less the name of a parent.
And I go back five generations on my mother's line also. I don't know if I'll ever find more information about Sirke, since Grodno Gubernia is the black hole of Jewish records.
I didn't do as badly as I thought I would. I have one fewer generation for my father's family line than Randy did but one more for my mother's.
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
Saturday, October 27, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Your Hallowe'en Personality
In keeping with the season, tonight's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun exercise from Randy Seaver is focused on Hallowe'en.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) Go take the Hallowe'en Personality Quiz at http://www.blogthings.com/whatsyourhalloweenpersonalityquiz/
(2) Post your answers on your own blog, as a comment on this blog, or on your Facebook page.
(3) Tell us if this is "right on" or not. Have fun with it!
Okay, here's what the quiz has to say about me:
• You See Halloween as Fun
• A bit of an introvert, you like the special occasions just as much as everyone else. You just have your own unique way of celebrating Halloween.
• You often feel invisible when you're in public. And it's a shame, because you're really quite a character.
• Your inner child is open minded, playful, and adventurous.
• Your fears are irrational and varied. It's hard to predict what you may be afraid of on any given day.
• You're logical, rational, and not easily affected. Not a lot scares you ... especially when it comes to the paranormal.
• You are unique, expressive, and a trendsetter. Your ideal Halloween costume is over the top and one of a kind.
Well, I think the quiz missed me on several counts. I'm pretty extroverted, and I don't often feel invisible anywhere. My friends and family will be happy to vouch, however, that I am quite a character. My fears are few and far between, and very consistent (buzzy things). I am indeed logical, rational, and not easily affected, and not a lot scares me (which contradicts the statement right above it, about my fears being irrational and varied). I will admit to being unique and expressive, although I don't think I've been setting any trends by wearing Hawaiian shirts. My ideal Hallowe'en costume used to be dressing up as a hooker; is that over the top? More recently, I tend to wear East Indian clothing.
I guess the quiz can't be relied upon very much, huh?
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) Go take the Hallowe'en Personality Quiz at http://www.blogthings.com/whatsyourhalloweenpersonalityquiz/
(2) Post your answers on your own blog, as a comment on this blog, or on your Facebook page.
(3) Tell us if this is "right on" or not. Have fun with it!
Okay, here's what the quiz has to say about me:
• You See Halloween as Fun
• A bit of an introvert, you like the special occasions just as much as everyone else. You just have your own unique way of celebrating Halloween.
• You often feel invisible when you're in public. And it's a shame, because you're really quite a character.
• Your inner child is open minded, playful, and adventurous.
• Your fears are irrational and varied. It's hard to predict what you may be afraid of on any given day.
• You're logical, rational, and not easily affected. Not a lot scares you ... especially when it comes to the paranormal.
• You are unique, expressive, and a trendsetter. Your ideal Halloween costume is over the top and one of a kind.
Well, I think the quiz missed me on several counts. I'm pretty extroverted, and I don't often feel invisible anywhere. My friends and family will be happy to vouch, however, that I am quite a character. My fears are few and far between, and very consistent (buzzy things). I am indeed logical, rational, and not easily affected, and not a lot scares me (which contradicts the statement right above it, about my fears being irrational and varied). I will admit to being unique and expressive, although I don't think I've been setting any trends by wearing Hawaiian shirts. My ideal Hallowe'en costume used to be dressing up as a hooker; is that over the top? More recently, I tend to wear East Indian clothing.
I guess the quiz can't be relied upon very much, huh?
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Monday, October 22, 2018
The Oregon Archives Crawl Was a Blast!
I am so glad I went to the Oregon Archives Crawl on Saturday! I had a lot of fun at the three locations talking to archivists, librarians, and others who work in archives and repositories. Since I'm still pretty new here, it was a great opportunity to learn about what resources are available.
One big difference between the Archives Crawl here and the ones I visited in Sacramento, Califorina is that it is pretty easy to walk between the host insitutions here. In Sacramento, the hosts were spread out, and you had to drive between them or take the shuttle that was available. Either way, a lot of your time was taken up traveling between locations, which didn't leave as much time to talk to archivists or look at the cool things on display.
The highlight of my day was at the City of Portland Archives and Records Center, the second stop on my rounds. They had a City of Portland quiz game going on, where you spun a wheel and could win the prize you landed on if you correctly answered a historical question about the city. I guessed right that Portland's city hall had been bombed at some point in its history, and I won a copy of Portland Memories: The Early Years, a Pictorial History. It's a beautiful hardcover coffee-table book with historic photos of Portland covering the late 1800's to 1939. I also picked up a deck of cards with Oregon historical information from the Oregon State Archives table, and a button with the State Archivist's seal. How many archivists have their own buttons?!
From an archives/research perspective, I discovered some really interesting repositories in the area. Probably the most unusual is the Oregon State Hospital Museum of Mental Health. In this country, mental health information is generally not easily available, so it was surprising to find that the hospital has created this museum to educate people. Documents and exhibits cover a timeline of the subject in Oregon dating from the 1880's, the training of those who worked at the hospital, spirituality/religion, the history of treatments, therapeutic activities, and children at the hospital (both patients and those of employees and residents), along with oral histories.
One museum that resonated with me personally is the World of Speed Motorsports Museum, which I had not heard of. (It's only been around for about three years.) I've written about how I grew up around racetracks and garages because my father was a car mechanic and also raced, so anything about racing catches my attention. Now I need to plan a trip to Wilsonville so I can see what they have in the museum.
I had a good conversation with Terry Baxter of the Oregon Country Fair Archives, another unusual repository. The archives holds organizational records, promotional records, fair ephemera, audiovisual records, and donated collections. Who would have thought that so much would be available about a county fair? In addition, Terry told me that the archives crawl happens every other year, so now I know why I didn't hear about it last year.
In talking with Terry about the crawl passport, I mentioned that the archives crawl in Sacramento, California has a passport also, where you can get stamps from all the exhibitors and then get a small prize, usually a set of commemorative coasters. He liked that idea, so maybe at the 2020 archives crawl here we'll be able to earn a small souvenir.
One big difference between the Archives Crawl here and the ones I visited in Sacramento, Califorina is that it is pretty easy to walk between the host insitutions here. In Sacramento, the hosts were spread out, and you had to drive between them or take the shuttle that was available. Either way, a lot of your time was taken up traveling between locations, which didn't leave as much time to talk to archivists or look at the cool things on display.
The highlight of my day was at the City of Portland Archives and Records Center, the second stop on my rounds. They had a City of Portland quiz game going on, where you spun a wheel and could win the prize you landed on if you correctly answered a historical question about the city. I guessed right that Portland's city hall had been bombed at some point in its history, and I won a copy of Portland Memories: The Early Years, a Pictorial History. It's a beautiful hardcover coffee-table book with historic photos of Portland covering the late 1800's to 1939. I also picked up a deck of cards with Oregon historical information from the Oregon State Archives table, and a button with the State Archivist's seal. How many archivists have their own buttons?!
From an archives/research perspective, I discovered some really interesting repositories in the area. Probably the most unusual is the Oregon State Hospital Museum of Mental Health. In this country, mental health information is generally not easily available, so it was surprising to find that the hospital has created this museum to educate people. Documents and exhibits cover a timeline of the subject in Oregon dating from the 1880's, the training of those who worked at the hospital, spirituality/religion, the history of treatments, therapeutic activities, and children at the hospital (both patients and those of employees and residents), along with oral histories.
One museum that resonated with me personally is the World of Speed Motorsports Museum, which I had not heard of. (It's only been around for about three years.) I've written about how I grew up around racetracks and garages because my father was a car mechanic and also raced, so anything about racing catches my attention. Now I need to plan a trip to Wilsonville so I can see what they have in the museum.
I had a good conversation with Terry Baxter of the Oregon Country Fair Archives, another unusual repository. The archives holds organizational records, promotional records, fair ephemera, audiovisual records, and donated collections. Who would have thought that so much would be available about a county fair? In addition, Terry told me that the archives crawl happens every other year, so now I know why I didn't hear about it last year.
In talking with Terry about the crawl passport, I mentioned that the archives crawl in Sacramento, California has a passport also, where you can get stamps from all the exhibitors and then get a small prize, usually a set of commemorative coasters. He liked that idea, so maybe at the 2020 archives crawl here we'll be able to earn a small souvenir.
Saturday, October 20, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: How Did You Get to School?
I am revisiting my childhood for this week's Saturday Night Genealogy Fun from Randy Seaver:
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) How did you get to your school(s) through high school?
(2) Tell us in your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+. Please leave a comment on this post with a link to your post.
It's obvious from Randy's comment about having gone to three schools (only three!) that his family didn't move around as much as mine did (there's a reason my mother earned the nickname "the wandering Jew"). Let me see how many I can recall . . . .
I don't really remember how I traveled to elementary school, or actually how many schools I attended during the years my family lived in California. We left in March 1971 while I was in 3rd grade. I know I was at Rorimer Elementary in 1st grade; that is in La Puente. When we moved to Pomona I'm sure I went to a different school, so that's at least two. I think I went by bus when I lived in Pomona. Maybe my mother drove me (and my sister?) to Rorimer, or maybe my sister's mother did? I guess I should ask my sister about that to see what she remembers. But there may have been a school between Rorimer and Pomona.
In Australia I attended two elementary schools: Daceyville Public School for the 4th grade (which I was in for only the second half of the school year) and Woollahra Demonstration School for the 5th grade. I remember my mother driving me to Woollahra, because she complained about it, but there may have been a bus to Daceyville.
When my family returned to the United States, we moved to Niceville, Florida. I had three months of the 6th grade, at James E. Plew Elementary School. (And for those who are counting, that makes at least five elementary schools I attended.) I rode the bus to school there.
I remember telling my mother that whether she moved or not, I wanted to go to the same school for all my years of junior high school and high school and not have to be the "new kid" in school. I actually managed to accomplish that. I rode the bus to school at C. W. Ruckel Junior High School and Niceville Senior High School, even after we moved 10 miles from Niceville out to Villa Tasso. We moved while I was still in junior high school. The school bus picked us up in Villa Tasso on County Line Road, because Niceville is in Okaloosa County and Villa Tasso is in Walton County, just over the county line.
When there was really bad rain, however, my mother sometimes drove us to school from Villa Tasso, because we didn't have paved roads, and they often flooded in the rain, so we couldn't safely walk to the bus stop. And if the temperature was below zero (which does happen in the Florida panhandle) she might drive us also. Sometimes she just drove us to the bus stop, though.
Until now, I have never thought about whether we were actually in the residence area for Niceville schools once we moved to Villa Tasso. We must have been, because the bus came out there. And really, we were so far away from everything else in Walton County that it wouldn't have been practical for Walton to bus us anywhere. I guess the counties worked out something.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) How did you get to your school(s) through high school?
(2) Tell us in your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+. Please leave a comment on this post with a link to your post.
It's obvious from Randy's comment about having gone to three schools (only three!) that his family didn't move around as much as mine did (there's a reason my mother earned the nickname "the wandering Jew"). Let me see how many I can recall . . . .
I don't really remember how I traveled to elementary school, or actually how many schools I attended during the years my family lived in California. We left in March 1971 while I was in 3rd grade. I know I was at Rorimer Elementary in 1st grade; that is in La Puente. When we moved to Pomona I'm sure I went to a different school, so that's at least two. I think I went by bus when I lived in Pomona. Maybe my mother drove me (and my sister?) to Rorimer, or maybe my sister's mother did? I guess I should ask my sister about that to see what she remembers. But there may have been a school between Rorimer and Pomona.
In Australia I attended two elementary schools: Daceyville Public School for the 4th grade (which I was in for only the second half of the school year) and Woollahra Demonstration School for the 5th grade. I remember my mother driving me to Woollahra, because she complained about it, but there may have been a bus to Daceyville.
When my family returned to the United States, we moved to Niceville, Florida. I had three months of the 6th grade, at James E. Plew Elementary School. (And for those who are counting, that makes at least five elementary schools I attended.) I rode the bus to school there.
I remember telling my mother that whether she moved or not, I wanted to go to the same school for all my years of junior high school and high school and not have to be the "new kid" in school. I actually managed to accomplish that. I rode the bus to school at C. W. Ruckel Junior High School and Niceville Senior High School, even after we moved 10 miles from Niceville out to Villa Tasso. We moved while I was still in junior high school. The school bus picked us up in Villa Tasso on County Line Road, because Niceville is in Okaloosa County and Villa Tasso is in Walton County, just over the county line.
When there was really bad rain, however, my mother sometimes drove us to school from Villa Tasso, because we didn't have paved roads, and they often flooded in the rain, so we couldn't safely walk to the bus stop. And if the temperature was below zero (which does happen in the Florida panhandle) she might drive us also. Sometimes she just drove us to the bus stop, though.
Until now, I have never thought about whether we were actually in the residence area for Niceville schools once we moved to Villa Tasso. We must have been, because the bus came out there. And really, we were so far away from everything else in Walton County that it wouldn't have been practical for Walton to bus us anywhere. I guess the counties worked out something.
Wednesday, October 17, 2018
Tuesday, October 16, 2018
Shared Responsibilities in a "Blended Family"
Loretta (family friend), Laurie, and Mary Lou, before the latter two lived with my family |
As I recall, Mary Lou would get us kids up in the morning, fix us breakfast, and help us get ready to go to school. My mother, who worked a graveyard shift at the time, would come home in time to see us before she went to sleep. She would then pick us up from school in the afternoon, spend time with us until our bedtime, and put us to bed. After that, she would go to work, and the cycle would start over again the next morning.
I think this was when my family lived in La Puente and Laurie and I attended the same elementary school, so roughly 1968. We apparently were well ahead of the curve with blended families and coparenting, which were probably terms that hadn't even been thought of yet.
And I had Laurie read this before I posted it, and she agrees it sounds right! Not doing too badly for events that happened when I was 6 years old.
Sunday, October 14, 2018
Google Translate versus Professional Translation
As a professional genealogist, one of the things I do is translation. I'm a member of a group of professional genealogy translators that was started to help raise awareness of the benefit of using a professional translator with specialized genealogical knowledge, as opposed to finding a general translator or just using Google Translate (or some other machine translation option). The group formed about two and a half years ago, and so far we haven't made much progress. Why we haven't made much progress is often a topic in our monthly online meetings.
The biggest problem we seem to have is conveying why it's better to use a professional translator, particularly one with specialized genealogical knowledge, as opposed to simply popping over to Google Translate and using its "automagic" translation. Google is awesome, right? It does so many cool things, and the translation is always improving. Why should I go out and actually *pay* someone when I can get it for free at home?
Well, for one thing, machine translation is far from perfect. Yes, it's improving all the time, but it still misses the mark quite often. A wonderfully entertaining article by Fred Hoffman (a professional translator) that points this out is available online in the October 2016 issue of Gen Dobry!. Another article by Fred, this one in the November 2009 issue of GenDobry!, truly makes clear why relying only on modern machine translation is no substitute for effort taken to find the correct meaning of an obsolete word.
Then what's a genealogist to do? To be fair, Google Translate does have its place. If you don't understand the language a record or document is written in, absolutely go to Google Translate, enter the text, and see what Google comes up with. It is rarely perfect (or 100% accurate), but you should be able to get the gist of what's going on. After that, if it seems as though the document is relevant to your research, find a professional translator to do a more accurate, more nuanced translation.
But why not just settle for what Google gives you? I equate that rough translation Google Translate gives you with the ubiquitous family trees on Ancestry.com and other sites. Since the vast majority of those trees have no sources listed (or list only other trees as sources), I look at them as hints and possibilities. I use them to mine for ideas for research. But I never rely only on them, because I have no idea where the information came from. They're stepping stones on a journey, but not the final destination.
Google Translate gives you hints. It's a "rough draft" of the meaning of your original text. But translation is an art, not a hard science, and machine translation still has many years to go before it can truly compare with what a professional translator can do. So it's a stepping stone on your journey to an accurate translation of your document.
And once you've decided you want to find a professional translator, where should you look? Well, for genealogy, I recommend going to the Association of Professional Genealogists site and clicking on the link for "Other Searches" under the "Find a Professional" navbar. On the "Advanced Search" page, you can scroll down and choose "Translator" on the "Service Category" pop-up and your desired language right below that. Then look through the results.
Of course, not every language is available. About 30 people come up for French, 25 for Italian, nine for Russian, and even three for Czech, but none for Finnish, Greek or Slovenian. So what to do if no APG members work in your language?
The next place to look is the American Translators Association. Near the top of the page you can search for a translator (or even an interpreter) by your beginning (source) language and then the language you want it translated to (target). ATA of course has members who translate from French, Italian, Russian, and Czech, but you can also find Finnish, Greek, and Slovenian, along with many more. The advanced search allows you to look for a specialized knowledge area; unfortunately, ATA doesn't list include genealogy on the list, which is why you're better off starting your search at APG. Professional genealogists are generally more familiar with terminology that appears in documents important to family history research and often have come across obsolete terms in old papers. Most ATA translators focus on modern-day language and may misunderstand older terms.
The biggest problem we seem to have is conveying why it's better to use a professional translator, particularly one with specialized genealogical knowledge, as opposed to simply popping over to Google Translate and using its "automagic" translation. Google is awesome, right? It does so many cool things, and the translation is always improving. Why should I go out and actually *pay* someone when I can get it for free at home?
Well, for one thing, machine translation is far from perfect. Yes, it's improving all the time, but it still misses the mark quite often. A wonderfully entertaining article by Fred Hoffman (a professional translator) that points this out is available online in the October 2016 issue of Gen Dobry!. Another article by Fred, this one in the November 2009 issue of GenDobry!, truly makes clear why relying only on modern machine translation is no substitute for effort taken to find the correct meaning of an obsolete word.
Then what's a genealogist to do? To be fair, Google Translate does have its place. If you don't understand the language a record or document is written in, absolutely go to Google Translate, enter the text, and see what Google comes up with. It is rarely perfect (or 100% accurate), but you should be able to get the gist of what's going on. After that, if it seems as though the document is relevant to your research, find a professional translator to do a more accurate, more nuanced translation.
But why not just settle for what Google gives you? I equate that rough translation Google Translate gives you with the ubiquitous family trees on Ancestry.com and other sites. Since the vast majority of those trees have no sources listed (or list only other trees as sources), I look at them as hints and possibilities. I use them to mine for ideas for research. But I never rely only on them, because I have no idea where the information came from. They're stepping stones on a journey, but not the final destination.
Google Translate gives you hints. It's a "rough draft" of the meaning of your original text. But translation is an art, not a hard science, and machine translation still has many years to go before it can truly compare with what a professional translator can do. So it's a stepping stone on your journey to an accurate translation of your document.
And once you've decided you want to find a professional translator, where should you look? Well, for genealogy, I recommend going to the Association of Professional Genealogists site and clicking on the link for "Other Searches" under the "Find a Professional" navbar. On the "Advanced Search" page, you can scroll down and choose "Translator" on the "Service Category" pop-up and your desired language right below that. Then look through the results.
Of course, not every language is available. About 30 people come up for French, 25 for Italian, nine for Russian, and even three for Czech, but none for Finnish, Greek or Slovenian. So what to do if no APG members work in your language?
The next place to look is the American Translators Association. Near the top of the page you can search for a translator (or even an interpreter) by your beginning (source) language and then the language you want it translated to (target). ATA of course has members who translate from French, Italian, Russian, and Czech, but you can also find Finnish, Greek, and Slovenian, along with many more. The advanced search allows you to look for a specialized knowledge area; unfortunately, ATA doesn't list include genealogy on the list, which is why you're better off starting your search at APG. Professional genealogists are generally more familiar with terminology that appears in documents important to family history research and often have come across obsolete terms in old papers. Most ATA translators focus on modern-day language and may misunderstand older terms.
Saturday, October 13, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: Your Sporting Activities
It looks like more people are helping Randy Seaver come up with new themes for Saturday Night Genealogy Fun:
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) What sporting activities did you participate in as a youth and as an adult?
(2) Tell us in your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+. Please leave a comment on this post with a link to your post.
Thank you to Lisa Gorrell for suggesting this SNGF topic.
Sports, huh? Never one of my strong points.
I don't remember any organized sports from when I was really young. I know I had a sports uniform (which I have kept all these years), worn one day a week, when I attended 5th grade at Woollahra Demonstration School (in a suburb of Sydney, New South Wales). I think Friday was sports day. I can't think of what sports we played at school, though. I recall having the opportunity to play soccer, cricket, and rugby while I lived in Australia, and I strongly disliked the first two. I doubt I was particularly good at any of them.
When my family returned to the United States, I was able to be bad at more sports. The only F I ever received in my life came in physical education. My teacher, who looked a little like Crystal Gayle but whose name I don't recall (I can still picture her in my mind), didn't believe that I couldn't do a cartwheel and failed me for that. She thought I was faking. Sorry, lady, I still can't do a cartwheel. But I'll always remember you (and not in a pleasant way).
I had various attempts at archery, basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball, all of which I was very bad at because I can't aim well. (My father learned this when he tried to teach me to shoot a gun.) Even trying to compensate for how I missed didn't work. One thing I was reasonably good at with baseball and softball was catching, but I never learned how to use a glove properly, so I always caught barehanded.
I did some bowling, mainly during summer breaks, but that was another thing where aiming was almost a prerequisite. I was the queen of gutter balls. I think my lifetime high score is in the 70's.
I was long and lanky, so I should have been good at running, but nope, I sucked at that also. It wasn't until I was in college that I learned I had totally flat feet. (One healthcare person told me they were so flat they almost went the other way.) At least that explained why I was so miserable at running.
I am pretty sure there were Girl Scout badges for sports stuff, but I don't remember if I earned any of them. I know I saved my uniform and badges, but I have no idea where they are in the house.
My brother and I used to play sandlot football in Villa Tasso with some of the other kids living out in the sticks. I always wanted to be a quarterback (I dreamed of playing for the Minnesota Vikings when Fran Tarkenton retired), but that whole problem with aiming bit me again. I was a good lineman, though. The guys had trouble moving past me, because it was like my feet were planted in the ground.
The closest I ever came to playing football was, many years later, being an assistant coach of a professional women's football team. I can't remember the team name or how I found out about it, but I drove from near the USC campus out to Van Nuys for the nighttime practices. This was not long after my knee surgery (see below), so I couldn't do a lot, and there was no pay. But I was thrilled to be part of it.
In college, however, I did find a few athletic activities at which I was at least adequate. I got into weightlifting about the summer of 1982, when I really, really wanted to try out as a walk-on for the USC football team. I had a couple of friends on the team, one of whom was a walk-on himself (Rick Vasquez, a quarterback), who encouraged me, and wide receivers coach Nate Shaw thought I should at least be given a chance. But John Robinson refused to talk to me. I competed in a couple of local weightlifting contests and even won two prizes.
During the time I was working out with weights, I also started bicycling as exercise and part of my training regimen, not just as a means of transportation (because I didn't have a car at the time). I used to ride laps around the USC campus. I think I built up to 11-mile runs, and then fall semester came and I was taking classes full time and working half-time in an office. Between that and wrenching a knee (which eventually needed surgery), boom!, there went the exercise routine. Because of the way I injured my knee, now I can't even ride a bicycle half a mile.
The other sporting activity I got into and enjoyed a lot was swimming. I had been swimming since I was a kid, but nothing major. USC had an Olympic-size swimming pool in the old PE building. I did lap swimming and built up to a mile at a time. I found it very relaxing and enjoyable.
At this point in my life I'm mostly fat and lazy. I walk, and that's about it. As a fan, however, I love the NFL and root for the Minnesota Vikings and Oakland Raiders. I enjoy baseball (see Lisa Gorrell's post on this topic) but haven't gotten really enthusiastic about a team since the Montreal Expos ceased to exist. And I will always love the Boston Celtics.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) What sporting activities did you participate in as a youth and as an adult?
(2) Tell us in your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+. Please leave a comment on this post with a link to your post.
Thank you to Lisa Gorrell for suggesting this SNGF topic.
Sports, huh? Never one of my strong points.
I don't remember any organized sports from when I was really young. I know I had a sports uniform (which I have kept all these years), worn one day a week, when I attended 5th grade at Woollahra Demonstration School (in a suburb of Sydney, New South Wales). I think Friday was sports day. I can't think of what sports we played at school, though. I recall having the opportunity to play soccer, cricket, and rugby while I lived in Australia, and I strongly disliked the first two. I doubt I was particularly good at any of them.
When my family returned to the United States, I was able to be bad at more sports. The only F I ever received in my life came in physical education. My teacher, who looked a little like Crystal Gayle but whose name I don't recall (I can still picture her in my mind), didn't believe that I couldn't do a cartwheel and failed me for that. She thought I was faking. Sorry, lady, I still can't do a cartwheel. But I'll always remember you (and not in a pleasant way).
I had various attempts at archery, basketball, volleyball, baseball, and softball, all of which I was very bad at because I can't aim well. (My father learned this when he tried to teach me to shoot a gun.) Even trying to compensate for how I missed didn't work. One thing I was reasonably good at with baseball and softball was catching, but I never learned how to use a glove properly, so I always caught barehanded.
I did some bowling, mainly during summer breaks, but that was another thing where aiming was almost a prerequisite. I was the queen of gutter balls. I think my lifetime high score is in the 70's.
I was long and lanky, so I should have been good at running, but nope, I sucked at that also. It wasn't until I was in college that I learned I had totally flat feet. (One healthcare person told me they were so flat they almost went the other way.) At least that explained why I was so miserable at running.
I am pretty sure there were Girl Scout badges for sports stuff, but I don't remember if I earned any of them. I know I saved my uniform and badges, but I have no idea where they are in the house.
My brother and I used to play sandlot football in Villa Tasso with some of the other kids living out in the sticks. I always wanted to be a quarterback (I dreamed of playing for the Minnesota Vikings when Fran Tarkenton retired), but that whole problem with aiming bit me again. I was a good lineman, though. The guys had trouble moving past me, because it was like my feet were planted in the ground.
The closest I ever came to playing football was, many years later, being an assistant coach of a professional women's football team. I can't remember the team name or how I found out about it, but I drove from near the USC campus out to Van Nuys for the nighttime practices. This was not long after my knee surgery (see below), so I couldn't do a lot, and there was no pay. But I was thrilled to be part of it.
In college, however, I did find a few athletic activities at which I was at least adequate. I got into weightlifting about the summer of 1982, when I really, really wanted to try out as a walk-on for the USC football team. I had a couple of friends on the team, one of whom was a walk-on himself (Rick Vasquez, a quarterback), who encouraged me, and wide receivers coach Nate Shaw thought I should at least be given a chance. But John Robinson refused to talk to me. I competed in a couple of local weightlifting contests and even won two prizes.
During the time I was working out with weights, I also started bicycling as exercise and part of my training regimen, not just as a means of transportation (because I didn't have a car at the time). I used to ride laps around the USC campus. I think I built up to 11-mile runs, and then fall semester came and I was taking classes full time and working half-time in an office. Between that and wrenching a knee (which eventually needed surgery), boom!, there went the exercise routine. Because of the way I injured my knee, now I can't even ride a bicycle half a mile.
The other sporting activity I got into and enjoyed a lot was swimming. I had been swimming since I was a kid, but nothing major. USC had an Olympic-size swimming pool in the old PE building. I did lap swimming and built up to a mile at a time. I found it very relaxing and enjoyable.
At this point in my life I'm mostly fat and lazy. I walk, and that's about it. As a fan, however, I love the NFL and root for the Minnesota Vikings and Oakland Raiders. I enjoy baseball (see Lisa Gorrell's post on this topic) but haven't gotten really enthusiastic about a team since the Montreal Expos ceased to exist. And I will always love the Boston Celtics.
Wednesday, October 10, 2018
Saturday, October 6, 2018
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun: 20 More Questions
Hmm, this week's questions for Saturday Night Genealogy Fun actually require a little bit of thought.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) Ellen Thompson-Jennings wrote 20 More Questions About Your Ancestors and Maybe A Few About You this week and Linda Stufflebean thought it would be a great SNGF challenge. I agree!
(2) Copy the questions from Ellen's post or from my post below and insert your own replies. Be sure to comment on Ellen's blog so she knows you wrote about it.
(3) Tell us in your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+. Please leave a comment on this post with a link to your post.
Thank you to Ellen for her post and to to Linda Sufflebean for suggesting this topic. If you have an idea for an SNGF topic, please let me know.
Q1: Why do you love doing genealogy/family history?
A1: Solving the puzzles. No two families are the same, so the answers are never exactly the same.
Here is your assignment, if you choose to play along (cue the Mission: Impossible! music, please!):
(1) Ellen Thompson-Jennings wrote 20 More Questions About Your Ancestors and Maybe A Few About You this week and Linda Stufflebean thought it would be a great SNGF challenge. I agree!
(2) Copy the questions from Ellen's post or from my post below and insert your own replies. Be sure to comment on Ellen's blog so she knows you wrote about it.
(3) Tell us in your own blog post, in a comment to this post, or on Facebook or Google+. Please leave a comment on this post with a link to your post.
Thank you to Ellen for her post and to to Linda Sufflebean for suggesting this topic. If you have an idea for an SNGF topic, please let me know.
Q1: Why do you love doing genealogy/family history?
A1: Solving the puzzles. No two families are the same, so the answers are never exactly the same.
Q2: How far have you traveled to research an ancestor?
A2: Only to Connecticut. But I sent my brother on research in Manchester, England.
Q3: What do you think your favorite ancestor would think of our lives today?
A3: I'm not really sure that I have a favorite ancestor. If I have to pick someone, I guess it would be my great-great-grandfather Gershon Yitzhak Nowicki (~1858–1948). His occupation on the passenger list when he arrived was given as wood turner, but in the United States he became a Hebrew teacher. From what I have been told, he was a pretty lively guy, even right up to the end and apparently adjusted reasonably well to living in this country after moving here at the age of about 64. I think he would be curious about our lives today and willing to learn new things.
Q4: What do you think that your ancestor would like/dislike?
A4: That's a damned good question. I haven't a clue.
Q5: What was the most unusual cause of death that you’ve found?
A5: I can't think of any particularly unusual causes of death that I've found in my own family. In my half-sister's family, I did find four generations of men who all (but one) died of heart attacks before reaching the age of 60.
Q6: Which ancestor had the most unusual occupation?
A6: I must have a pretty boring family, because I don't recall any particularly unusual occupations. The aforementioned great-great-grandfather, who was marked on his 1922 incoming passenger list as a "likely public charge", probably because of his age, was enumerated eight years later in the 1930 census with the occupation of Hebrew teacher, however, so he was still working at the age of about 72.
Q7: Have you ever gone to where your ancestor lived and it felt like home even if you’ve never been there before?
A7: Unfortunately, no. That happened to me the first time I came to Portland, but I have no family connection to the city.
Q8: Do you have a distant ancestor (several generations back) that looks like someone in the family?
A8: Sort of. I have a copy of a photograph of an unidentified man whom I believe to be my 3rd-great-grandfather, because he bears a strong resemblance to my great-great-grandfather (his theoretical son) and has the distinctive Gorodetsky ears.
Q9: What is the oldest ancestral photo that you have?
A9: The oldest photo I have is of my great-great-grandparents Victor Gorodetsky and Esther (Schneiderman) Gorodetsky and their first child, Etta. It was taken in Kamenets Podolsky, Russia (now in Ukraine), probably about 1890.
Q10: Did you have an ancestor that had an arranged marriage?
A10: Not that I know of, although it's likely that some of my Jewish ancestors did have arranged marriages.
Q11: If you could live in the time period of one of your ancestors what year would it be? Where would it be?
A11: About 1834 in Manchester, Lancashire, England, the year after my 3rd-great-grandparents Richard Dunstan and Jane Coleclough married. I especially would ask Jane who her parents were and where she was born.
Q12: Which ancestor was married the most times?
A12: My father and his father were each married three times, but my grandfather also had a long relationship with my grandmother without benefit of marriage, so he probably wins. Grampa married Elizabeth Leatherberry Sundermeier about 1922, Anita Clarice Loveman in 1953, and Adelle Cordelia Taylor in 1961, and he lived with my grandmother Anna Gauntt from about 1934–1952.
Q13: If you’ve tested your DNA, what was the biggest ethnicity surprise?
A13: The 12% Irish ancestry that Ancestry said I have, and then also said that my brother has. So far I have nothing in my research to substantiate that. On the other hand, I don't actually believe it, either.
Q14: Did you have a female ancestor who was different or unusual from other females from that time period?
A14: My mother, who was not inclined toward domesticity and worked outside the home from the earliest that I can remember.
Q15: Did your ancestor go through a hardship that you don’t know how they managed?
A15: Not an ancestor, but a collateral relative. According to information from the 1900 census, my 3rd-great-grandfather's brother's wife (I said collateral, remember?) had three children who were living, but in 1910 she reported that she had had three children and none of them was alive. Losing all three of your children within a ten-year period would have to be devastating.
Q16: How often do you research? Are you a genealogy addict?
A16: I do some research almost every day, but even if I'm not researching, I do something related to genealogy every day. I'm definitely addicted.
Q17: Do you have someone in your family that will take over the family history?
A17: Not yet, and definitely not for my own family. So far the most interest has been shown by my older stepson, in my research into his family.
Q18: Have you had a genealogy surprise? What was it?
A18: By the time I finally got the results of the DNA test it wasn't that much of a surprise, but I did confirm that my paternal grandfather's biological father was not the man his mother married.
Q19: Are you a storyteller? What’s your favorite family story?
A19: I am a pretty good storyteller, which works well when I'm giving genealogy presentations. My favorite family story is about how my father competed on Ted Mack's Amateur Hour and came in second place to Gladys Knight.
Q20: What was your greatest genealogy discovery?
A20: Learning that the Sellers family is descended from Alexander Mack, the founder of the Schwarzenau Brethren (Dunkers), even though I've since learned that I'm not actually a descendant of Mack because I'm not biologically a Sellers.
Labels:
Coleclough,
Connecticut,
DNA,
Dunstan,
family stories,
Gauntt,
Gladys Knight,
Gorodetsky,
Loveman,
Mack,
Manchester,
Nowicki,
Saturday Night Genealogy Fun,
Schneiderman,
Sellers,
Sundermeier,
Ted Mack's Amateur Hour
Friday, October 5, 2018
Oregon Archives Crawl
While I was living in California, I wrote about the Sacramento Archives Crawl (this year taking place tomorrow, October 6, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.), part of the outreach during Archives Month. The point of Archives Month is to make more people aware of archives and the great information you can find in them, and to encourage everyone to preserve their own records.
Well, after I moved to Oregon, it sure wasn't going to be practical to fly back to Sacramento just for that Archives Crawl. But now I've learned about the Oregon Archives Crawl! (There was no crawl in 2017, so that's why I didn't hear about it last year. But Oregon appears to have been celebrating Archives Month since 2008.)
It seems to be set up similarly to the one in Sacramento, with a few facilities hosting tables for many archives and records repositories. This year's event is being held on Saturday, October 20, from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (a couple of hours shorter than the event in Sacramento). The host institutions are the City of Portland Archives and Records Center, the Oregon Historical Society, and the central branch of the Multnomah County Library. You can start crawling from any of the hosts and then progress to the others.
This year's theme is "Changing Attitudes." Thirty-two groups are participating, including some from Washington State.
The Crawl also has a Facebook page, where it has been featuring posts about several of the groups that will have tables.
So I'm looking forward to visiting the different locations, talking with lots of archivists, and learning about what's available. Anyone want to come out and "crawl" with me?
Well, after I moved to Oregon, it sure wasn't going to be practical to fly back to Sacramento just for that Archives Crawl. But now I've learned about the Oregon Archives Crawl! (There was no crawl in 2017, so that's why I didn't hear about it last year. But Oregon appears to have been celebrating Archives Month since 2008.)
It seems to be set up similarly to the one in Sacramento, with a few facilities hosting tables for many archives and records repositories. This year's event is being held on Saturday, October 20, from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (a couple of hours shorter than the event in Sacramento). The host institutions are the City of Portland Archives and Records Center, the Oregon Historical Society, and the central branch of the Multnomah County Library. You can start crawling from any of the hosts and then progress to the others.
This year's theme is "Changing Attitudes." Thirty-two groups are participating, including some from Washington State.
The Crawl also has a Facebook page, where it has been featuring posts about several of the groups that will have tables.
So I'm looking forward to visiting the different locations, talking with lots of archivists, and learning about what's available. Anyone want to come out and "crawl" with me?
Wednesday, October 3, 2018
Wedding Wednesday
Mirta and Max |
Max and Mirta were both born in Cuba, Max probably in Guanabacoa and Mirta in Habana. I know the Szocherman family had already been traveling to and from New York prior to Castro coming to power, but they apparently moved there permanently after that event. Max and Mirta likely knew each other already in Cuba.
Max, Tania, Julia, Louis, Mirta (face mostly hidden), ?, ?; Foreground: back of rabbi's head |
Front row: Julia, ?, Mirta; Left/middle: ?, ?, Tania, Fanny, Welwel; Back: Max, Honey, ?, ? |
Left: Julia, Honey, Eli; Right: hat, Fanny, Louis; Back: ?, ? |
Left: Julia, Honey, Eli; Right: hair, back of head with hat, Louis, Fanny, ? |
Julia, Tania, Honey, Eli |
?, Louis, Fanny, ?, ?, ? |
Labels:
1959,
Amron,
cousins,
Cuba,
Mata,
New York City,
Nowicki,
Szocherman,
weddings
Monday, October 1, 2018
Whoops! A Tad Behind in Wrapping Up FGS Day 3
Where does the time go? I just realized that I didn't finish reporting on this year's FGS conference, having failed to write about the last day, even though one of the best sessions took place then. Shame on me!
I began my Saturday with a volunteer shift at the Association of Professional Genealogists booth in the exhibit hall. We usually don't get a lot of people stopping by, but it's nice to have the resources available for those who want to ask about the organization. As usual, most of the inquiries I fielded were about how to find a professional genealogist to help with research, but a couple of new BYU graduates with degrees in family history asked for advice on starting a professional genealogy business. I'm happy to spend some time in the booth to help promote the primary American organization for professional genealogists.
During my time in the booth, I popped out a couple of times and spent some time looking in the exhibit hall for good deals to spend some free "dealer dollars" that I received with my registration. I finally decided on one of those books for a grandparent to write down information about his life and give to a grandchild — my boyfriend wants to create memories for his younger granddaughter, and I thought this would be a helpful supplement to the time they spend cooking together — and a more general memory book focused on events on each decade from the 1930's to the current time. It's always fun to get free stuff, and the books ended up costing me not even a penny.
After my shift was over, I zoomed over to catch a session in the first time slot. As much as it pained me to do so, I did not attend Tony Burroughs' presentation on oral history. While Tony is one of my personal inspirations as a genealogist, I have read quite a bit about taking oral histories, and I thought I would be better served to learn something new. In that vein, I went to Tina Beaird's talk on Scottish Presbyterian Church records, and I'm glad I did. I know a fair amount about religious records, but I learned some specifics about the Presbyterian records, which can include not only the sacramental records one would expect (births, marriages, deaths) but also confirmations, transfers, pauper records, school records, session minutes, suscription lists, and print publications. Wow, that's a lot of places to find information about your family members! And Tina was a good speaker, too!
After Tina's talk came the lunch break. Near the end of the break, MyHeritage held a trivia quiz in their booth, with attendees who answered questions about flags correctly winning various prizes, including DNA tests and annual subscriptions. I managed to eke out a three-month subscription by guessing the right answer for the flag of Papua Guinea.
I spent the afternoon learning more cool genealogy information. Ari Wilkins talked about how former slaves, after Emancipation, used newspaper advertisements and the Freedmen's Bureau to try to reconnect with family members. No study has been done to determine how successful people were, but it appears that for the most part they were not. It seems that more researchers are successful nowadays in reuniting family branches by using DNA and tracking down cousins.
Janis Minor Forté spoke about strategies to identify slave owners and then using that information to reconstruct slave-era families. I already knew the techniques she described, but it's always good to attend talks such as this because there are often little gems you find nowhere else. Since I have not been able to move any of my family lines past the 1865 barrier, I need all the help I can get.
The final presentation I heard was Judy Russell, the Legal Genealogist, covering copyright myths, in her version of the top ten. The most important thing I learned in this session was that something I had been told years ago was wrong. I don't even remember where I learned it, but someone I trusted gave me incorrect information about copyrights on photographs. After Judy's talk it became clear to me that having your photographs developed in no way reduces or negates your copyright in those photos. The developer functions as a publisher does for a book. I'm glad I never passed on that bad information to anyone else but annoyed at myself for not having analyzed it better.
I had a great time at this year's FGS conference and learned a lot. I'm so glad I had the opportunity to go.
I began my Saturday with a volunteer shift at the Association of Professional Genealogists booth in the exhibit hall. We usually don't get a lot of people stopping by, but it's nice to have the resources available for those who want to ask about the organization. As usual, most of the inquiries I fielded were about how to find a professional genealogist to help with research, but a couple of new BYU graduates with degrees in family history asked for advice on starting a professional genealogy business. I'm happy to spend some time in the booth to help promote the primary American organization for professional genealogists.
During my time in the booth, I popped out a couple of times and spent some time looking in the exhibit hall for good deals to spend some free "dealer dollars" that I received with my registration. I finally decided on one of those books for a grandparent to write down information about his life and give to a grandchild — my boyfriend wants to create memories for his younger granddaughter, and I thought this would be a helpful supplement to the time they spend cooking together — and a more general memory book focused on events on each decade from the 1930's to the current time. It's always fun to get free stuff, and the books ended up costing me not even a penny.
After my shift was over, I zoomed over to catch a session in the first time slot. As much as it pained me to do so, I did not attend Tony Burroughs' presentation on oral history. While Tony is one of my personal inspirations as a genealogist, I have read quite a bit about taking oral histories, and I thought I would be better served to learn something new. In that vein, I went to Tina Beaird's talk on Scottish Presbyterian Church records, and I'm glad I did. I know a fair amount about religious records, but I learned some specifics about the Presbyterian records, which can include not only the sacramental records one would expect (births, marriages, deaths) but also confirmations, transfers, pauper records, school records, session minutes, suscription lists, and print publications. Wow, that's a lot of places to find information about your family members! And Tina was a good speaker, too!
After Tina's talk came the lunch break. Near the end of the break, MyHeritage held a trivia quiz in their booth, with attendees who answered questions about flags correctly winning various prizes, including DNA tests and annual subscriptions. I managed to eke out a three-month subscription by guessing the right answer for the flag of Papua Guinea.
I spent the afternoon learning more cool genealogy information. Ari Wilkins talked about how former slaves, after Emancipation, used newspaper advertisements and the Freedmen's Bureau to try to reconnect with family members. No study has been done to determine how successful people were, but it appears that for the most part they were not. It seems that more researchers are successful nowadays in reuniting family branches by using DNA and tracking down cousins.
Janis Minor Forté spoke about strategies to identify slave owners and then using that information to reconstruct slave-era families. I already knew the techniques she described, but it's always good to attend talks such as this because there are often little gems you find nowhere else. Since I have not been able to move any of my family lines past the 1865 barrier, I need all the help I can get.
The final presentation I heard was Judy Russell, the Legal Genealogist, covering copyright myths, in her version of the top ten. The most important thing I learned in this session was that something I had been told years ago was wrong. I don't even remember where I learned it, but someone I trusted gave me incorrect information about copyrights on photographs. After Judy's talk it became clear to me that having your photographs developed in no way reduces or negates your copyright in those photos. The developer functions as a publisher does for a book. I'm glad I never passed on that bad information to anyone else but annoyed at myself for not having analyzed it better.
I had a great time at this year's FGS conference and learned a lot. I'm so glad I had the opportunity to go.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)